![]() |
| Recall Scott Walker Fight Harassment |
Showing posts with label GOP dirty tricks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GOP dirty tricks. Show all posts
Saturday, December 10, 2011
WKOW: Anti-Recall Man Repeatedly Harassed Pro-Recall Residents at Their Homes
Friday, February 12, 2010
Charlie Sykes and Paul Ryan: These Guy Are Good!
by bert
Any of us can bitch of course. But there is a reason that radio talk show host Charlie Sykes gets paid to do it all week long.
A Baryshnikov of bellyaching, Sykes is able to leap gracefully on "his" blog from complaining about an idea to cut Medicare when it's a Democratic idea to the geometrically opposite position in support of cuts. He gets from here to there because now the idea is Republican Paul Ryan's.
Paul Krugman of the The New York Times has noticed this same acrobatic about-face by the GOP on the issue of caring for our grannies.
As snowboarders would say, that leap was sick.
Any of us can bitch of course. But there is a reason that radio talk show host Charlie Sykes gets paid to do it all week long.
A Baryshnikov of bellyaching, Sykes is able to leap gracefully on "his" blog from complaining about an idea to cut Medicare when it's a Democratic idea to the geometrically opposite position in support of cuts. He gets from here to there because now the idea is Republican Paul Ryan's.
Paul Krugman of the The New York Times has noticed this same acrobatic about-face by the GOP on the issue of caring for our grannies.
So cutting Medicare by $500 billion is wrong--support Republicans, who [Paul Ryan, to be specific] want to cut it by $650 billion!
As snowboarders would say, that leap was sick.
Labels:
Charlie Sykes,
GOP dirty tricks,
Medicare,
Paul Krugman,
Paul Ryan
Friday, September 12, 2008
The Hack Van Hollen
Update: MJS - There is a strong whiff of partisan politics from state Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen’s lawsuit on Wisconsin's voter list.
It was all of one week ago that Attorney General Van Hollen was making a speech to Wisconsin GOP delegates extolling the virtues of Sarah Palin, saying she will help expand the Republican Party (MJS, Greg J. Borowski, Sept. 4, 2008).
Now this McCain Co-Chair, Van Hollen, says with a straight face that he has no conflict of interest and that he does not act for partisan or political reasons.
Borowski's MJS piece notes that, "Van Hollen stressed Palin's pro-life credentials, terming her 'somebody who believes in God, who believes in family, who believes in life.'"
Van Hollen also called the Republican Party a "family".
C'mon, is this not at the very least an appearance of a conflict of interest?
It was all of one week ago that Attorney General Van Hollen was making a speech to Wisconsin GOP delegates extolling the virtues of Sarah Palin, saying she will help expand the Republican Party (MJS, Greg J. Borowski, Sept. 4, 2008).
Now this McCain Co-Chair, Van Hollen, says with a straight face that he has no conflict of interest and that he does not act for partisan or political reasons.
Borowski's MJS piece notes that, "Van Hollen stressed Palin's pro-life credentials, terming her 'somebody who believes in God, who believes in family, who believes in life.'"
Van Hollen also called the Republican Party a "family".
C'mon, is this not at the very least an appearance of a conflict of interest?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

